콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 최근
  • 인기
  • 태그
스킨
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 기본 (스킨 없음)
  • 스킨 없음
축소

Coinsori

  1. 홈
  2. News
  3. Ripple's Schwartz Question if Bitcoin Tech Matter

리플의 슈워츠, 비트코인 기술이 중요한지 의문을 제기

예약됨 고정됨 잠김 이동됨 News
1 게시물 1 작성자 1 조회수
  • 오래된 순
  • 최신 순
  • 가장 많은 투표
답글
  • 토픽으로 답글
로그인 후 답글 작성
이 토픽은 삭제되었습니다. 토픽 관리 권한이 있는 사용자만 볼 수 있습니다.
  • K 오프라인
    K 오프라인
    kim
    에 작성함 마지막 수정자:
    #1

    The Bitcoin network’s tech is under renewed scrutiny following a rare "two-block reorg" that saw a single mining entity, Foundry USA, seize control of seven consecutive blocks.

    The event has reignited a debate over the long-term viability of the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism.

    Ripple CTO David "JoelKatz" Schwartz has weighed in on the matter, arguing that Bitcoin's greatest strength might actually be a centralizing liability.

    Proof-of-work as a "centralizing force"

    Bitcoin proponents often cite PoW as the gold standard for decentralization, but Schwartz offered a contrarian perspective. He has argued that PoW is actually a "centralizing force" that the network is constantly forced to fight against.

    "It really demonstrates a point that I've made several times," Schwartz noted on X. "Bitcoin's decentralization doesn't come from its use of PoW; rather, PoW is a centralizing force Bitcoin has to keep fighting against."

    The tech vs. first-mover debate

    Schwartz was then asked if the market is beginning to "price in" the systemic risks and perceived inefficiencies of the PoW model.

    The Ripple veteran has admitted that these concerns could be exerting "downward pressure" on the price of Bitcoin, but he noted that such a trend is nearly impossible to prove with hard evidence.

    A governance conundrum

    There is also a Catch-22 facing the Bitcoin community regarding mining centralization, according to Schwartz.

    If the community attempts to change the mining algorithm to fix these issues, it proves that "nothing is guaranteed" and that the "mathematical immutability" of the system is subject to human intervention. Conversely, if they leave it as is, it establishes that network security is permanently tied to a centralizing arms race.

    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:e43fa155b094b:0-ripple-s-schwartz-question-if-bitcoin-tech-matters/

    1 답글 마지막 답글
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    등록 로그인
    답글
    • 토픽으로 답글
    로그인 후 답글 작성
    • 오래된 순
    • 최신 순
    • 가장 많은 투표


    • 로그인

    • 계정이 없으신가요? 등록

    • 검색하려면 로그인하거나 등록하세요.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 첫 게시물
      마지막 게시물
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 최근
    • 인기
    • 태그